Fraud Doesn’t Have to Be a Cost of Doing Business

GUEST BLOGGER

Zach Capers, CFE
ACFE Research Specialist

As a fraud examiner, I often see occasions when it seems that others do not recognize the seriousness of the threat posed by fraud. While Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) are trained to be familiar with many of the underlying causes of fraud and associated prevention strategies, fraud is too often dismissed by others as an acceptable loss or casually labeled as a cost of doing business. Moreover, management at many organizations would simply prefer to ignore these problems and absorb losses from fraud rather than open the company up to scrutiny and risk reputational harm. This frustrating attitude not only breeds an environment of indifference, but can often exacerbate the very factors that lead to fraud in the first place.

Few other industries are reputed to treat the problem of fraud with more apathy than that of construction. According to the ACFE’s 2014 Report to the Nations, 3.1 percent of all reported fraud cases occurred within the construction industry, resulting in a median loss of $245,000. Additionally, a recent Grant Thornton report found that approximately 10 percent of the global construction industry’s profits are lost to fraud — a staggering amount totaling an estimated $860 billion.

While the ACFE’s new online self-study course, Construction Fraud, might seem suited only for those people either directly or indirectly involved in the construction industry, it has been designed to be of use to CFEs of all backgrounds. One of the most interesting aspects of fraud in the construction industry specifically is the fact that, from the inception of a project to its completion, virtually every type of scheme imaginable can take place, including corruption, bid rigging and fraudulent disbursements. Furthermore, the intricacy of most construction projects requires the inclusion of numerous parties, including government officials, corporate executives, contractors, suppliers and procurement specialists to name only a few. These factors combine to form a veritable microcosm of fraud from which everyone can learn.

Perhaps it is this overwhelming complexity that causes people to view fraud as an inevitable consequence of business in not only the construction industry, but countless others as well. However, all CFEs know that the only people benefiting from fraud in any industry are the fraudsters themselves.

Fraud affects the bottom line of all companies, which in turn affects every employee, whether in the form of a decrease in benefits, a salary increase put on hold, or any number of other negative consequences. For this reason, we should never accept fraud merely as a cost of doing business and should instead endeavor to change the permissive attitudes that enable fraud at the expense of everyone else.

Investigator Casts Focus on Insolvency Cases

MEMBER PROFILE

Bettina Kuntz, CFE
Grant Thorton UK LLC

Bettina Kuntz, CFE, is an executive in the fraud insolvency division at Grant Thornton UK LLP. Since joining the ACFE in 2009, she has built her network of fraud experts and sought out training on the latest types of fraud schemes. Kuntz said this has helped her keep up-to-date with the fraud investigation community worldwide and anticipate new types of fraud encountered by clients.

What does your job involve on a daily basis? 

I work for the team at Grant Thornton UK LLP that specializes in forensic work, asset tracing and recovery. My work involves managing forensic investigation and contentious insolvency cases using the powers granted under the Insolvency Act 1986.

What types of cases do you investigate? 

My portfolio of cases includes a range of high profile instructions with a cross border aspect. These include, for example, the liquidation of Madoff Securities International Limited, bankruptcies, proceeds of crime cases and court appointed receiverships involving assets tracing assignments in France, Luxembourg, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Morocco, BVI and the USA. Most recently, I have assisted with the court appointed receivership of Boris Berezovsky.

When did you decide to pursue the CFE credential?

It was recommended to me by a colleague. She suggested I undertake the training as a way to gain technical skills and validate my experience in the field of fraud investigation. She described it to me as a ground breaking qualification with a growing network of members worldwide. Grant Thornton is very supportive of individual initiative for staff development, so I ordered the CFE Exam Prep Course and was the first employee to complete my CFE exams.

What do you do when you’re not at work? 

I split my time between hot yoga, golf, Mandarin Chinese lessons and completing a master in law in dispute resolution. I also visit my hometown of Strasbourg in Alsace, on a regular basis.

Read more profiles of ACFE members in the Career Center on ACFE.com.