At Play in the Fields of the County Recorder's Office

SPECIAL TO THE WEB

Annette Simmons-Brown, CFE

It's easy to record a document onto the title of a real property. Typically one needs only to have the proper form of a real estate document — a "conveyance of ownership" instrument, a mortgage document, a lien form, a power of attorney, an affidavit — and the appropriate legal information about the property, access to a notary's approval (or just a notary's stamp or seal) and filing instructions for the county recorder's office (or comparable office in your local jurisdiction). Then, bingo, the document can be filed and recorded with no verification of the truth of the information it asserts. Easy filing — coupled with no need to verify the filing's substance — enable significant, varied and lucrative frauds.

Within six months, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office (HCAO) in Minneapolis, Minnesota, charged two separate defendants with various criminal offenses in which false filings of documents at the county's registrar of titles/county recorder's office played significant roles.

The defendants — both 34-year-old men with professional résumés in real estate and investments — stole hundreds of thousands of dollars by the time they were charged with racketeering and other assorted fraud-related counts. Their routine fraudulent activities highlighted the vulnerabilities of public systems that are entirely dependent on personal honesty. (Neither defendant knew each other, for which we can be grateful.)

In part one of this two-part article, we'll examine the peregrinations of one Trevor "Bam-Bam" Baker — a financial crime generalist and all-around tiresome individual. In part two, we'll examine the specialized antics of Rory Sykes — whom I call the Lizard King of Foreclosure Fraud. Although their schemes were different, their common playground was the county recorder's office, and their respective hauls were substantial.

THE ADVENTURES OF BAM-BAM BAKER

Trevor Baker was a 6'6" bruiser of a self-styled home builder/renovator and all-around real estate whiz in Hennepin County. Before he discovered the fraud potential in real estate, he worked for a national investment house as a sales and executive investment trainee and learned the logistical operations of this and similar companies. He later became a mortgage loan officer and a commissioned notary public in the mid-2000s. His bar buddies gave him the nickname Bam-Bam, for reasons that faileth human understanding, and so that's how investigators and prosecutors later referred to him.

Bam-Bam had eight business entities registered in three states: Lucerne Capital L.P., Lucerne Builders, Lucerne Group, Marketech Investments Inc. (two entities with the same name), Geneva Capital L.L.C., Geneva Trust and Geneva Capital Trust. Remarkably, all of these entities operated out of a post office box the size of a toaster oven at a UPS outlet in a Hennepin County suburb known for its higher median incomes and relative transience. Bam-Bam listed himself variously as the "qualifying person," "general partner," and "director of investments" for these entities.

Bam-Bam also had a mother, Pamela, who had some business integrity "issues"; an honest grandmother, Edith; a soon-to-be ex-wife, Melissa, who had a healthy income and an increasing contempt for Bam-Bam; and a soon-to-be ex-brother-in-law, Dennis, whom Bam-Bam could easily manipulate.

Melissa's contempt for Bam-Bam was well-founded. For although Bam-Bam had all of these wonderful business entities, Melissa never saw him build or renovate anything unless it was a residence in which he lived. He bought, built or renovated these residences by fraudulently obtaining large loans, and he facilitated these loans by regularly filing false documents with the county recorder's office. 

Read the full article on Fraud-Magazine.com.

The Top 5 Frauds of 2013

AUTHOR’S POST

Mandy Moody, CFE
ACFE Social Media Specialist

As we say farewell to one year and look ahead to a new one, we would like to look back and take note of the top fraud cases that brought many people, cities, states and countries together. While these top five fraud stories of 2013 seemingly highlight the “bad guys,” we would like to pay tribute to all of the “good guys” out there who saw these cases through investigation, prosecution and, for some, sentencing. So here’s to all of the investigators, fraud examiners, attorneys, auditors, accountants and government officials who worked behind the scenes to get these stories where they belong: on the front pages of Financial Crime sections all over the world.

Here are our top five frauds of 2013:

  1. Cars, Houses & Horses
    Dubbed as “one of the worst abuses of public trust” in the state of Illinois’ history, the embezzlement case involving a devoted city bookkeeper stole international headlines when it was finally settled in February. Rita Crundwell was sentenced to almost 20 years, the same duration as her fraud, for stealing $53 million from the small town of Dixon, Ill. Crundwell used her home town’s hard-earned money almost as a weekly allowance to pay for vacations, properties, cars and an extravagant horse-breeding hobby. Thankfully, even all bad things must come to an end.
  2. Ahab’s Whale Wounded
    The Hunt for Steve Cohen began years ago, but it wasn’t until July that his company, SAC Capital was officially indicted on four counts of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud for insider trading dating back to 1999. The future looks grim for the already shrinking company facing some long and grueling legal battles.
  3. The Citadel Falls
    In June, a cyber gang responsible for creating a massive network of malware came crashing down. “Citadel,” the name of the network of botnets, stole more than $500 million from the bank accounts of more than 5 million infected computers over an 18-month period. Microsoft led the coordinated effort with more than 80 other entities worldwide to take down one of the largest cyber crime rings in the world. Lights out, Citadel.
  4. The GlaxoSmithKline of 2013 Award Goes To…
    Last month, Johnson & Johnson, one of the U.S.’s biggest pharmaceutical companies, settled one of the largest health care settlements in the country’s history. J&J agreed to pay $2.2 billion ($1.72 billion for civil settlements and $485 million in criminal fines and forfeited profits) for promoting three drugs not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This quote from Zane Memeger, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, pretty much sums it up: “J&J's promotion of Risperdal for unapproved uses threatened the most vulnerable populations of our society - children, the elderly and those with developmental disabilities.”
  5. Biggest Mortgage Fraud Settlement Ever
    Also last month, JPMorgan Chase settled the U.S.’s largest-ever mortgage fraud case for $13 billion. Picking up Bear Stearns and WaMu might have seemed like a great idea in 2008, but the ghosts of the financial crisis’ past came back to haunt JPMorgan. Oh yeah, and they were also responsible for millions of faulty mortgages. One victory in a battle sure to go on longer than the Game of Thrones.

Want to read other stories from 2013? You can find more of the year’s top fraud headlines on our news blog, FraudInfo.com

Why We Do What We Do: The ACFE’s Global Fraud Survey

GUEST BLOGGER

 

John Warren, J.D., CFE
ACFE VP and General Counsel

 

 "The average corporate fraud lasts up to 18 months before detection and involves more than $140,000.” - Walt Pavlo, “Forget NSA Surveillance, Your Company is Watching You," Forbes.com, June 26, 2013

"Research shows that worldwide, payroll fraud comprises 8.5 per cent of occupational fraud and costs an average of £46,195 per payroll fraud case." - UK National Fraud Authority, Annual Fraud Indicator, March 2012

"… It's not surprising that fraud in the workplace increased during the economic crisis and recession. The median loss tied to occupational fraud is $160,000 … so the issue is something about which many companies are rightfully concerned. Small businesses are especially vulnerable." - The Huffington Post, June 5, 2012

When you read a news story about a fraud case or a report about some aspect of financial crime, you’ll often see the writer reference statistics like the ones above. You may not think a lot about the stats directly, but they give the story context and help you understand the issues relating to the subject in a more meaningful way. 

What these quotes have in common – aside from being about the subject of fraud – is they were taken from the ACFE’s Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. That study, which is based on actual cases investigated by CFEs, has become one of the go-to sources for major media outlets looking for statistical data on occupational fraud. It’s also frequently cited by academics and researchers as resource material for their own fraud studies, and of course it’s used every day by ACFE members to educate their clients about fraud risk. 

In some ways, the Report to the Nations is the most important educational resource the ACFE produces. It not only provides useful information to ACFE members, but it also helps us show those outside the anti-fraud community the staggering losses that occupational fraud imposes on our economy. Let’s face it; if we as anti-fraud professionals are going to be effective at our jobs, the first thing we need to do is convince those who hire us that it’s worth investing and supporting us in what we do. The Report helps us make the case that our work is critically important.

The Report is only made possible by the contributions of CFEs throughout the world who take the time to fill out the Global Fraud Survey and tell us about one fraud case they’ve investigated in the last two years. That survey was recently distributed to all CFEs, and if you haven’t already filled it out I strongly encourage you to do so here. It’s one of the most important things you can do as a CFE to help support the ACFE mission. (Please note, we won’t ask you to identify any parties to your case, and your response will be kept confidential). 

Whenever I see the Report quoted in the media or cited by someone doing fraud research, I think about all the CFEs who took the time to help us assemble the data that went into that study, and I’m proud to be a part of an organization whose members have so much knowledge and are so ready to share it. The next time a stat like those above show up in a story you’re reading, I hope you’ll remember that the information came from your colleagues at the ACFE – or better yet, I hope you’ll be able to pat yourself on the back for having contributed your own case to the study.   

Take the Global Fraud Survey.